Clean language: withholding interpretation of symbols

from Study Session 1 on "Experiential Processes and the Creation of Meaning

clean language : Pending interpretation of symbols

I realized that this framework could be used to explain how the clean language I presented last time works.

https://gyazo.com/8c032e6ed13e52ab073564458706f3d4

When a person tries to put into words something F that he/she can't say well and says A, it's not a parallel EXPLICATION of course because it's "not well said"!

So the FA that RECOGNITIONed by the person who heard it is of course not F

Stop RECOGNITION there.

https://gyazo.com/5c088381cbf99bc1b93d9f59a0c2784a

Focus only on the phenomenon of "the other person said A."

I understand why the rule is "don't change the words the speaker used."

Using the word A used by the other party can point to F, even if the word came from a non-parallel process

I don't know what that F is, but it's not a practical problem.

And asking a question to it F generates a CIRCUMLOCUTION

CIRCUMLOCUTION is the creation of RELEVANCE between experienced meaning

F becomes clearer as RELEVANCE increases.

https://gyazo.com/5207a53b26112fa57b4bc19ae2a3dbc5

Keichobot's behavior can now be explained without attributing it to "that's the rule with clean language"!

"COMPREHENSION of how Clean Language works! fully understood.icon"

---

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/クリーンランゲージ:シンボルの解釈を保留する. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.